Dr. Lauren J. Footman, EdD | Advancing community safety, organizational development and women in leadership | End Community Violence Now.
getty
Leadership development has become increasingly focused on the visible aspects of leadership: executive presence, confident communication, strategic thinking, networking and the ability to command a room. These are valuable capabilities, but when development focuses too heavily on how leadership appears from the outside, we risk losing sight of what makes leadership credible from the inside.
Leadership is not simply a set of behaviors that can be learned and performed. Effective leaders are often those who have developed enough self-awareness to understand how they lead, why they lead that way and how their leadership affects others.
Authenticity: More Than ‘Being Yourself’
We often tell leaders to “be authentic,” but authenticity is frequently oversimplified. It does not mean saying everything you think, sharing every part of yourself or refusing to adapt. Leadership requires judgment, and effective leaders must understand their audiences, navigate different personalities and adjust their communication to different circumstances.
Authenticity is about understanding what should change and what should remain grounded. A leader can become more strategic, improve how they communicate and assume greater responsibility without abandoning the values that shape their leadership. Authenticity is therefore less about complete transparency and more about alignment between values, decisions and behavior.
When Development Becomes Imitation
Emerging leaders frequently receive messages about what leadership is supposed to look like. They are encouraged to speak with greater authority, become more polished, project confidence and strengthen their executive presence. The problem occurs when development becomes imitation.
Someone who built strong relationships by being approachable may begin to believe accessibility makes them appear less authoritative. Someone who naturally listens before speaking may feel pressure to become the most vocal person in the room. A collaborative leader may become more directive because that style is perceived as more executive. In trying to demonstrate leadership, people can begin questioning the qualities that made others trust them in the first place.
Leadership development should expand a person’s capacity to lead, not require them to adopt a personality that feels foreign. There is a meaningful difference between learning how to lead more effectively and learning how to perform leadership.
How Leadership Development Should Include Identity
Organizations spend considerable time teaching leaders what to do, but development should also help people understand who they are when they lead. That requires asking deeper questions: “What experiences shaped the way I lead? What values are nonnegotiable? How do I respond under pressure? What happens when someone challenges my authority? What do people experience when they work with me? Where are my blind spots?”
These questions have practical implications for how leaders make decisions, manage conflict, build trust and exercise authority. Leadership identity develops through experience, but experience alone does not guarantee growth. Coaching, mentorship, feedback and reflection can help leaders recognize patterns in their behavior and understand how those patterns affect others.
Some of the most important leadership lessons emerge after a difficult conversation, a failed initiative, an unsuccessful decision or feedback that was difficult to hear. Those experiences become developmental when leaders examine what happened, understand what it reveals about their leadership and determine what they want to carry forward.
Why Authenticity Must Leave Room For Growth
Authenticity should not be confused with remaining exactly the same throughout a career. Leaders are supposed to grow, and greater responsibility will require new capabilities. The way someone leads a small team should not necessarily be the way they lead an entire organization. Leaders may need to become more decisive, strategic, comfortable delegating or willing to make decisions with incomplete information.
The important question is whether that change is intentional or whether we are gradually becoming the person we believe others expect a leader to be. There is a difference between developing your leadership and losing yourself in the process. Authenticity allows leaders to evolve while maintaining continuity around who they are, what they value and what they stand for.
Rethinking Executive Presence
Organizations should also reconsider how they define executive presence. It is often associated with confidence, polish, authority and charisma. While those qualities can contribute to effectiveness, they should not become a narrow definition of credible leadership.
Some effective leaders are quiet and deliberate. Some ask more questions than they answer. What these leaders share is not a particular personality or communication style, but credibility. Their behavior is consistent with their values, their actions reinforce their words and people understand what they can expect from them.
A more meaningful form of executive presence is not about performing authority. It is about developing enough clarity and confidence in your leadership that you do not constantly have to prove you belong in the room.
Developing Leaders Without Creating Copies
Organizations should continue investing in communication, strategic thinking, negotiation, conflict management and decision making, but those capabilities should be developed alongside leadership identity. Meaningful leadership development should help people understand what they want others to experience when working with them, how their values influence their decisions and what happens to their leadership when circumstances become difficult.
The goal should not be to produce leaders who communicate the same way, have the same personality or demonstrate the same version of executive presence. Leadership is ultimately experienced through relationships. People form their perceptions of leaders through how they respond when something goes wrong, how they treat people who disagree with them, whether they listen and take responsibility and whether their decisions reflect what they say they value.
Perhaps the next evolution of leadership development is moving beyond teaching people to fit a predetermined image of leadership and instead helping them develop the self-awareness, judgment, skills and confidence to lead effectively in a way that is genuinely their own.
We don’t need more people who know how to look like leaders. We need more people who know who they are when they lead.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
