Angela Palo is COO of Pinnacle Financial Services, a leading National Medicare Brokerage, and member of the NABIP Medicare FMO Council.
getty
I’ve experienced corporate acquisitions from both sides: First as a leader inside an acquired business, and later as part of a leadership team that acquired another company.
Both experiences taught me that culture has operational consequences long before they appear in financial results. It influences who makes decisions, how quickly a team responds, what employees say when a leader leaves the room and whether business partners continue receiving the service they expect.
Leaders can analyze revenue, expenses, systems and reporting structures before an acquisition. Without examining the habits behind those results, they enter integration with an incomplete picture of the business they bought.
Culture lives in daily decisions.
Earlier in my career, I helped grow a business from fewer than a dozen employees to more than 50 while expanding nationally. Growth required new technology, stronger processes and greater accountability. It also required us to protect the relationships and responsiveness that helped us earn trust.
Few entrepreneurial businesses reach the acquisition stage with every process polished. Their teams usually develop their own rhythm. People know who can settle an issue, which leader will give a direct answer and how far they can go without asking permission. Long-standing employees also carry institutional knowledge that may never make it into a procedures manual.
Changing reporting lines or approval processes can quickly disrupt that rhythm. Employees become uncertain about who has authority. Leaders who once solved problems directly begin escalating routine issues, which slows decisions. Business partners can notice the delayed response before senior leadership sees anything unusual on a dashboard.
Mission statements and employee events tell only part of the story. Culture becomes easier to see in how people communicate, make decisions, take ownership, handle pressure and recover from mistakes.
Consistency can protect a business without flattening it.
Acquisitions require change. A larger organization needs reliable reporting, effective technology, clear governance and consistent controls. Autonomy can’t become an excuse for unnecessary risk or outdated processes.
Problems arise when integration treats every difference as a defect. A national process can bring welcome discipline to one area while adding needless friction to another. Extra layers of approval can protect a high-risk decision while slowing routine service. A standardized communication process can improve visibility while weakening a relationship built on direct access to a trusted leader.
Leaders need enough curiosity to understand the difference. Preserving culture doesn’t mean freezing a business in place.
Growing into a national business required us to reconsider some informal habits while protecting the ones that continued to support performance. Growth forced us to examine what still worked, what had become a constraint and where our team needed more structure.
The same work applies during an acquisition. Integration becomes more productive when leaders separate useful independence from avoidable inconsistency. The goal should be to add scale and discipline without stripping away speed, market knowledge or personal accountability.
Start cultural diligence before integration.
Culture conversations lose much of their usefulness if they begin after closing. Employees are already reading leadership behavior, comparing communication styles and deciding what the transaction means for their future.
Due diligence gives leaders time to understand how work gets done before new processes begin changing it. Review decision authority, escalation habits, incentives, communication norms and informal leadership influence alongside the financial and operational records. Where access allows, conversations grounded in real situations can provide additional insight.
Ask employees to explain how the team handles a service failure, an urgent partner concern, a missed target or a disagreement between departments. Their answers can reveal where authority sits, how accountability works and which relationships hold the business together.
Recent research from PwC suggests many organizations still wait too long to examine those questions, and only 16% of acquirers assess leadership and talent, or conduct people and organizational diligence, before signing. Organization design and decision rights were the most commonly cited people-related challenge, at 56%, followed by culture alignment and management of people-related change, both at 52%.
The same survey found that successful acquirers were consistently more likely to define important operating-model decisions before closing. That reinforces a practical point: Decisions about people, authority and operating structure belong earlier in the deal process, not after employees have already begun adapting to the new organization.
Give people a clear map.
Vague promises about preserving culture can create more uncertainty than confidence. Employees need to know which parts of the business will continue, where change is coming and what the combined organization is building.
A useful integration plan separates the work into 3 categories:
1. Preserve what drives trust and performance. Identify leadership behaviors, relationships, market knowledge, service habits and decision practices that contribute to results.
2. Change what creates risk or limits growth. Address inconsistent controls, outdated technology, concentrated authority and informal processes that no longer serve the business.
3. Build what the combined organization needs next. Establish clear expectations for communication, decision authority, accountability and collaboration.
Putting those choices in writing forces leaders to explain the logic behind integration. It gives employees a clearer view of what leadership respects about the acquired business, where greater discipline is needed, and how their work fits into the combined organization.
Clarity also creates accountability. Leaders can assign ownership to specific integration decisions, explain which tradeoffs they are making and revisit those choices when the results do not match expectations.
Watch what people do next.
In my experience, the first signs of cultural trouble usually appear in daily operations. Decisions take longer, escalations increase and acquired leaders become hesitant to act without approval. Leaders can watch decision speed, retention in pivotal roles, escalation volume, partner attrition and system adoption to see where integration is creating friction.
Ownership provides one of the clearest signals. People who understand their authority continue making decisions, raising concerns and solving problems. Uncertainty makes people more likely to wait.
An acquisition brings together more than systems and financial expectations. It also brings relationships, institutional knowledge and working habits that already produced results. Effective integration adds scale, stronger systems and shared accountability while preserving the qualities that made the business worth acquiring.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
