As Chief Strategy Officer at Linqia and co-host of the Creator Economy Live podcast, Keith Bendes is a top voice in Influencer Marketing.
getty
Every year, Linqia surveys enterprise marketers on the state of influencer marketing. And every year, one finding is consistent: Proving ROI remains the number one challenge ahead of finding the right creators, scaling programs and managing content rights combined.
That’s not a budget problem. It’s a measurement problem.
Most brands are still evaluating influencer marketing the way they did five years ago, with impressions, likes and maybe clicks. But the channel has matured significantly. Brands are spending seven, eight, even nine figures annually on creator partnerships. CMOs are allocating influencer spend alongside traditional media, and yet, the measurement frameworks haven’t kept pace.
Here’s what a modern approach actually looks like. It’s built around five pillars that give you a complete picture of what influencer marketing is actually doing for your brand.
2. Media Effectiveness
Here’s where a lot of brands leave money on the table. Creator content doesn’t have to live and die on organic social. When you boost influencer posts as paid social ads (what the industry calls “whitelisting” or “allowlisting”), you can measure performance the same way you would any paid media buy (CPMs, CTRs and cost per acquisition against your benchmarks).
What we consistently find is that creator content outperforms brand-produced creative in paid media, often dramatically. That performance data is one of the most compelling arguments you can make to a CFO questioning your influencer investment, especially since most brands are spending 50x to 100x more on paid media than influencer marketing as a channel.
3. Content Efficiency
This one tends to get overlooked entirely. Creator-generated content isn’t just a distribution play, it’s a content production model. When you compare the cost of influencer content on a per-asset basis against what you’d spend on a traditional production shoot, the math is usually striking.
Brands working with creator ecosystems at scale are effectively building a cost-efficient, always-fresh content library that extends far beyond social. Think paid ads, email, retail, CTV. Measuring and reporting the content value generated, and not just the campaign value, changes how stakeholders view the investment.
It’s worth noting that your content budget may not be going down year over year despite the efficiencies. But that’s because you need many times more content than you ever have before, so creators are the only way to generate that content efficiently.
I love the interview the Virgin Voyages CMO did with AdAge where he spoke about how the lifespan of brand content has shrunk dramatically for their brand, so much so that a year ago Virgin could run the same ad for up to a month, but is now on a four-day cycle of wear-out. Plus their content pipe has to be six times what it used to be just to produce the same level of results.
4. Lift In Primary KPI
This is where measurement gets serious. Whatever your campaign objective is (brand awareness, purchase intent, foot traffic, online conversion) there should be a mechanism to measure whether influencer drove movement on that metric.
Brand lift studies, third-party sales measurement, geo-lift tests and pixel-based attribution each have their place depending on your category and objectives. The key is establishing the methodology before the campaign launches, not scrambling to prove impact after the fact. If you can’t measure it, you’ve already lost the argument.
I’d also put MMM reporting into this bucket. Most large enterprise brands run some kind of mix modeling, and ensuring that “influencer” is a line item in that reporting structure is critical. I constantly see “influencer” as the number one or number two ROI channel despite being the lowest spend channel. There’s no better proof that more money should be put into creator partnerships than a strong MMM read.
5. Learnings And Insights
The fifth pillar is the one that compounds over time, and is the most chronically underreported to leadership. Every influencer campaign generates a wealth of intelligence: which creative formats drove the strongest response, which audience segments over-indexed, which product messages resonated.
These insights should be feeding back into your broader creative strategy, media planning and product development. Brands that treat influencer as an always-on learning engine consistently outperform those running one-off campaigns. The measurement of learnings isn’t just what worked, it’s what you’ll do differently next quarter because of it.
Social search and AEO could fall into this bucket, but frankly, we may need to establish a sixth pillar given the rise of AI search. Understanding the top queries and creators being referenced by social platforms and LLMs when consumers are intentionally searching provides a trove of valuable data, and creating content with those creators to answer those top consumer questions is one of the most valuable ways to activate creator partnerships right now.
The Bottom Line
Influencer marketing has earned its seat at the table, but with that seat comes the expectation of accountability. The brands that will continue to grow their creator investments are the ones who can walk into a budget review and articulate impact across multiple dimensions, not just show a highlight reel of creator posts.
The five pillars above aren’t a perfect measurement solution—no single framework is—but they’re a starting point for having a more honest, complete conversation about what influencer marketing is delivering, and building the internal case to invest in it the right way.
Forbes Communications Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?
