Photo Credit: Adam Nir
Cardi B secures another win against gossip vlogger Tasha K, who now owes the star $60,000 for violating a previously established non-disparagement agreement.
Tasha K keeps setting them up; Cardi B keeps knocking them down. The gossip vlogger has agreed to pay the rap star $60,000 for violating a previously established non-disparagement settlement. That’s on top of the massive $4 million settlement Cardi B already secured in her victory against the gossip personality in 2022.
Last year, Tasha K (real name Latasha Kebe) entered into a bankruptcy agreement in order to postpone the collection of that judgement—but that included the strict condition that she not make any further disparaging remarks about Cardi B or her family.
But Tasha violated those terms in a series of social media broadcasts and radio show appearances. In them, she discussed two of Cardi B’s former partners: estranged husband, rapper Offset; and NFL star Stefon Diggs, the father of Cardi B’s youngest child. Because of this breach of the agreement, a judge ruled that Tasha must cover Cardi’s legal expenses she incurred while enforcing compliance, which amounted to a whopping $110,000.
However, Cardi B agreed to reduce the penalty to $60,000—provided that Tasha adheres to a strict payment schedule. She must transfer $30,000 to the rapper within the next month, while the remaining balance is due by the end of the year. If Tasha defaults on the payment plan, Cardi may pursue the original $110,000.
None of that ends the other legal battles that remain active between the two parties, and Tasha still owes the original $4 million defamation judgement. Cardi B is also pursuing a separate lawsuit against Tasha’s husband, who allegedly intentionally shielded their marital assets to prevent collection.
Tasha has attempted to appeal the massive debt that she owes, but a federal judge has denied her request. At that point, the two parties struck a payment plan in which Tasha would pay $1.2 million over a five-year period, deferring the remaining balance—but she violated her end of the agreement, meaning she once again owes the full amount.
