Trump
Getty Images
Like any other taxpayer, the United States President must file a tax return and pay taxes on their income. But the settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service has raised new questions about how the agency handles presidential tax matters. According to reporting from CNBC and Al Jazeera, the agreement includes a provision shielding Trump and his family from pending IRS audits involving past tax years — a protection that does not extend to future filings or potential criminal investigations.
How Presidential Taxes Normally Work
While the President holds a distinguished position in office, the IRS treats him the same as any other taxpayer. Trump earns money from his position as president and from nonpresidential activities, such as his business dealings; he must pay taxes on those earnings and file his income tax return on or before April 15.
His tax returns are confidential government documents and the taxing authority cannot publicly disclose them. While many presidential candidates voluntarily disclose their past returns, Trump never did so, which raised scrutiny of his business dealings. The public’s desire to see his tax returns led to leaks of information, most notably via The New York Times. This leak led Trump to sue the U.S. government, claiming damages for the involuntary disclosure of his tax returns.
Inside The Trump v. IRS Settlement
After the disclosure of his tax return information, Trump sued the IRS for $10 billion in damages. In the settlement of Trump v. Internal Revenue Service, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche agreed that the government would create a fund totaling $1,776,000,000 for an Anti-Weaponization Fund, to compensate individuals who were wrongfully targeted by prior administrations.
Al Jazeera reports that the settlement also included a narrower provision shielding Trump and his family from pending IRS audits related to past tax years. The IRS may still audit future filings, and the settlement does not grant immunity from potential criminal tax investigations.
3 Key Takeaways From Trump’s IRS Settlement And Tax Audit Controversy
(1) Trump’s Pending Tax Audits Are Likely Behind Him
Many might have already forgotten that Trump has been engulfed in tax controversy, including the People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump case. In that lawsuit, Trump and his family were accused of misrepresenting property values for financial gain. New York Attorney General Letitia James prosecuted the case and won. Trump and his family were required to pay $464 million in damages.
Trump previously faced significant civil and federal tax scrutiny, including the New York civil fraud judgment and multiple IRS audits. While those matters remain separate, the settlement’s audit-related protections mean that any IRS audits already underway for past years will not proceed, according to Al Jazeera.
(2) Trump’s Current And Future Taxes Remain Open To Scrutiny
The Trump v. Internal Revenue Service settlement bars the IRS from continuing pending audits of Trump’s past tax issues. But current and future tax matters can still be subject to audit and prosecution. Critics argue that even this limited protection raises concerns about presidential immunity. The only immunity presented to Trump applies to past financial transactions already under review.
Some critics warn that granting any form of audit protection could set a precedent for future attempts to seek similar immunity. Only time will tell whether Trump and his family pursue additional protections.
(3) The Settlement Could Still Face Challenges
The creation of a $1.776 billion fund and the audit-related protections for Trump and his family are significant. They are so significant that they could lead to challenges and potential attempts to overturn the settlement.
Critics of the settlement have been widespread and include lawmakers from both parties. After all, Trump filed the lawsuit, and he effectively settled it, creating a potential conflict of interest in how the matter was resolved. If all or part of the settlement is challenged, it could lead to a stay, allowing his past financial matters to continue to be prosecuted until the courts hear the case.
While those objecting to the settlement might welcome this as a sign that Trump’s financial matters will not be immune from scrutiny, it is important to note that if the case is appealed, the U.S. Supreme Court would hear it. Even if the court takes up the case, it currently houses several Trump-appointed judges. Thus, many hurdles remain that could prevent the overturning of the settlement.
